Concern About Proposed Algebra Curriculum

CT Academy for Education says “NO” to guidelines established by the National Mathematics Advisory Panel and ACHIEVE’s American Diploma Project despite call to benchmark standards

The CT Coalition4 World Class Math expressed shock and disappointment at the Model Algebra I curriculum being developed under a quarter of a million dollar grant from the Connecticut Department of Education. The new Algebra course is the first step in Commissioner Mark McQuillan's ambitious high school reform effort to raise achievement across Connecticut schools.

The model curriculum, even at this draft stage of design, has already provoked serious concerns about its suitability for Connecticut students. Critics complain that the model Algebra course would leave out important topics that most mathematicians agree are essential to preparing students for college and career.

“Connecticut has not had a successful program in mathematics for at least the last 10 years,” said Stanford University’s James Milgram, Professor Emeritus Algebraic Topology. “There is now overwhelming evidence that these mathematics curricula do not work.” Milgram predicts Connecticut will “continue its decline in math outcomes relative to the U.S. and even more dramatically, relative to the rest of the world.”

· A staggering 40% of incoming college freshman at Connecticut colleges and universities need remedial math courses

· Only 5% of college students take higher level mathematic classes necessary in fields such as engineering and finance

· The high remediation rate comes with a steep price as well. It is estimated the state would save $12.5 million annually and students would earn an additional $16.4 million if the remediation rate were lowered

Algebra is considered a gateway course for students, as data by the College Board found a close correlation between completion of Algebra in high school and the ability of students to earn a degree. Nevertheless, students are arriving to our colleges and universities unprepared and in need of remediation. The Accuplacer Exam, developed by the College Board to determine placement in college level courses including mathematics, covers topics that are in keeping with the recommendations of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel and those of ACHIEVE’s American Diploma Project.

The state of Connecticut is a network member of ACHIEVE, an organization created in 1996 by the nation’s governors and corporate leaders, whose goal is to improve the rigor and clarity of the process of standard-setting and testing. The CT Coalition4 World Class Math is disquieted by the drafters’ (CT Academy for Education) dismissal of ACHIEVE and the American Diploma Project.

Achievement in the state as measured by critical indicators (CAPT, CMT, NAEP) is stagnant or declining. “There is clearly something wrong,” says Sandra Stotsky, Professor of Education Reform at the University of Arkansas. “Large percentages of students report taking advanced mathematics courses, such as Algebra II, trigonometry, and pre-calculus. But scores are flat. What is being taught in these courses? Are they being watered down?” questions Stotsky.

Commissioner McQuillan sought to address the poor performance of many Connecticut students in his high school reform proposal known as The Connecticut Plan. “I fear that the disastrous model Algebra course could doom the Commissioner’s entire high school reform effort,” said spokesperson Laura Troidle. “Connecticut citizens are counting on the Department of Education to get this first step right. It will serve as a model for future courses and this could endanger the Commissioner’s desperately needed high school reform effort.”

For more information visit http://www.ctcoalitionforworldclassmath.com/
or email ctmath@sbcglobal.net

Bad at math? Blame your parents. (Yeah, right.)

Bullpucky.

Balderdash.

Baloney.

Bad at Math? Blame It on Your Parents
And if your kids aren't good at math, blame yourself

This hogwash is brought to you courtesy of NBC - Connecticut.

I have no doubt that what the UCLA researchers found as to faster nerve impulses resulting in faster signaling and therefore, faster processing of information is true. Clearly, some people learn things at a faster rate than others. We all have our cognitive limits.

Nevertheless, these limits can be challenged. Intelligence is malleable. (See Daniel Willingham, Why Don't Students Like School? )

We already have a problem in our country with accepting this view as part of our culture, we don't need people going around making excuses for their lack of math ability. Our children, in particular, need us to be convincing them of quite the opposite.

"In China, Japan, and other Eastern countries, intelligence is more often viewed as malleable. If students fail a test or don't understand a concept, it's not they're stupid-- they just haven't worked hard enough yet. This atrribution is helpful to students because it tells them that intelligence is under their control. If they are performing poorly, they can do something about it." -Willingham, p. 131

Math ability is the result of deliberate practice, the kind of practice that makes perfect. Doing well in math requires effort and sometimes it's not particurlarly fun. As Willingham so clearly points out, sometimes we do our best to avoid thinking altogether. That's precisely why effort matters. "When children believe that their efforts to learn make them smarter, they show greater persistence with math." (National Mathematics Advisory Panel) This is the message that we need to communicate to our children (and to ourselves as parents).

So am I saying the researchers at UCLA got it all wrong? Not at all. Science supports what they've discovered about genetics influencing intelligence. However, we must temper this view with caution. "Our genetic inheritance does impact our intelligence, but it seems to do so mostly through the environment. There is no doubt that intelligence can be changed," states Daniel Willingham. Clearly, a child born to parents who are good at math or who communicate a passion for math, and who encourage this trait in their own children are going to alter the outcome.

The environment isn't limited to home and to parenting either. This news story is irresponsible because it's letting educators off the hook and blaming parents and children for a lack of math ability! Clearly, well qualified teachers of mathematics armed with a coherent and cumulative curricula can increase mathematics ability in children. They do so in Singapore and Finland and many, many other countries that outperform us on internationally benchmarked assessments. Our children are no less capable. Our children are underperforming.

I'll close with what's now become my favorite math quote:

"The universe is a far more beautiful and elegant place than any of us can imagine. We must be ready and able to both construct and use mathematics to help explain ever more subtle aspects of it, and the phrase `I will never use it' should be deleted from our students' vocabularies."

James Milgram, Professor Emeritus
Stanford University

I would only add that the phrase "I'm bad at math" should be deleted from our students' vocabularies as well.

*See also: Ten Myths About Math Education and Why You Shouldn't Believe Them

-------------------------------------------
If you'd like to know how you can get involved with improving Connecticut's math standards, visit http://www.ctcoalitionforworldclassmath.com/
-------------------------------------------

Bad at Math? Blame It on Your Parents And if your kids aren't good at math, blame yourself - NBC CT
Study gives more proof that intelligence is largely inherited- UCLA Newsroom